Search Site
Menu
“Extras” in Your Child Support Order

Minnesota has legal guidelines based on parents’ combined income that the court must use for computing basic child support. However, some parents may find that basic child support does not provide enough payment for private school tuition, sports programs and travel teams, summer camp, and enrichment activities, such as music lessons and dance classes. Many divorcing parents are able to work out a child support settlement that goes beyond the basics of the guidelines, because they want to minimize the negative impact of their divorce on their children and allow them to maintain a certain lifestyle. However, not all parents are in agreement about the importance of extracurricular activities or private school. If you want these perks for your children but the other parent is resistant, you either have to reach more deeply into your own pocket, or litigate the matter in family court.

Minnesota law does require the court to consider factors that would augment child support payments above the basic level. These factors, from 2015 Minnesota Statutes 518a.43, are cited as:

  • The extraordinary financial needs and resources, physical and emotional condition, and educational needs of the child to be supported
  • The standard of living the child would enjoy if the parents were currently living together, but recognizing that the parents now have separate households

The first factor applies predominantly to special needs children whose care and maintenance are extraordinarily expensive relative to typical children of the same age. If you have a special needs child, you can rest assured the court will consider relevant expenses when ordering support. The second factor listed above pertains to children of parents who have the means to provide the benefits that most parents aspire to give their children.

In deciding whether to augment child support, the standard the court applies is whether the parents would have provided a certain amenity had they not gotten divorced. The court looks at the pattern of the parents prior to divorce. If children were already enrolled in private school, the court may order sufficient support to continue that schooling. If a child has not entered school, and has no older siblings who have attended private school, the court would look at other factors, such as the relative quality of available public schools and the importance in the parents’ minds of religious education in their child’s formation. With regard to enrichment activities, the court may also take notice of the habits and practices of the child’s peers and of similarly situated families in the same area with similar incomes. However, any order the court may issue also depends on the added financial burden of maintaining two households where once there was one.

If you’d like further information on how to enhance court-ordered child support during your divorce, contact our family law attorneys with Appelhof, Pfeifer & Hart, P.A.

Our Attorneys
Client testimonials
  • "Tori had a thorough understanding of my situation and made excellent recommendations to resolve my concerns. She was persistent on communication and handled everything in a very timely manner. I would definitely hire her again in the future if needed." - M.K.

  • "With Appelhof, Pfeifer & Hart, P.A., it is like having a family physician. They are all knowledgeable, thorough, comforting, and the only call I need to make for all my legal needs for many years to come. No matter what the matter, I totally trust their advice and commitment to me and my family." - J.N.

  • "Mary from APH Law helped me thru a difficult divorce. She and the entire staff was there for me every step of the way helping me on what to do next. They listened to what I wanted and helped me achieve what matter the most to me in the divorce settlement." - Dana C.

  • "I chose APH after my initial consultation with Mary. I felt my best interest would be represented. The entire process went excellent, the attorneys and staff communicated effectively and efficiently with me throughout the process as they needed to. Being new to the legal process and verbiage, they walked me and talked me through the next steps and the jargon, I felt completely comfortable and represented. I hope I never have to use legal services again but if I do I will call Mary at APH Law and know that I will be taken care of." - Jeff M.

  • "Divorce is a time of emotion and stress. Mary Pfeifer , My lawyer was professional and compassionate. She was very informative through the process. Her insight helped me in my decisions. She worked hard to obtain a settlement which was fair to both parties. Though, I hope I won't need her help again. It is reassuring to know a good person that is willing to help." - Rod S.

  • "I first came to Ms. Jacquelyn Lutz of Appelhof, Pfeifer and Hart in October of 2016. It was definitely the worst time in my life and she compassionately spoke with me about my options. Ms. Lutz thoroughly explained the laws, statutes, process and what to expect going forward. What was supposed to be one case, turned into three intricate cases that took a huge toll on me and my family. Ms. Lutz represented me in court on all three cases with a vast knowledge of the laws and how to proceed accordingly. During all three cases she kept me informed, calm, gave me resources to utilize, and (most important) gave me a realistic view of what may come next. Ms. Lutz knew each case required a great deal of knowledge and creative thinking on how to legally proceed forward with each case. My family and friends are forever grateful for the amazing representation by Ms. Lutz. I highly recommend Ms. Lutz for anyone needing or considering superb representation for any kind of family law. " - M.H.

AWARDS & RECOGNITION


superlawyers
Contact us

Quick Contact Form